Friday, 30 September 2011

Dictatorship 101 : get a big bomb




The thing I've learned which will serve me well when I inevitably become dictator of some benighted patch is this:

As soon as you win your coup turbo start your weapons of mass destruction programme. Developing your own capabilities would be best though buying naughty weapons on the black market is also acceptable.

Then you can relax in your blood soaked palace safe from attack or criticism of your tacky tastes in decor.

If our recent history, and indeed Iraq, has taught us anything it is that if you want to remain in dictator splendour and satisfy your every need in unmitigated luxury the weapons of mass destruction are vital.

Iraq was overthrown. Libya had our backing to kick out their dictator. Iran, Syria, North Korea remain undemocratic without any real western criticism.

Can you guess which countries have weapons of mass destruction and which don't?

It's sad that every would be dictator will have learned the same thing. The terrible thing is that the world, and I'm not just talking about the western bit, are so weak and cowardly that we don't have the resources, moral fibre, or international structures to stop millions of people from being denied their supposed inalienable rights.

Vile nuclear and bioweapon dictators are allowed the thrive because we let them.

This cowardice and such powerful weapons is a recipe for disaster.

Shame that.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, 29 September 2011

The world is in turmoil and the front page of the Daily Mail is about plastic bags!

As it happens I'm a bit of a 'ol greeny. I recycle and all that.

However I have to say that I think that with the world wracked by debt, war, and social unrest with millions fearful for their jobs I find it peculiar that the Daily Mail seems to think that the most important story in the world is David Cameron's drive to reduce the number of plastic bags we use whilst shopping.

This is their front page story!

We are facing economic collapse and this is the most important story in the world for the Mail?

Seems odd.

Worse than that is the effort Cameron has put in devising this policy to force the great unwashed to stop using plastic bags.

Shouldn't he have more important things to worry about?

I'm environmentally conscious but this seems to show that out leaders and newspapers have lost their sense of proportion.

My worry is that Cameron is fixated with plastic bags as it allows him to boss us around and show how powerful he is because he is powerless to deal with the more important issues which face us.

Odd story.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Wednesday, 28 September 2011

On the passing of David Croft

Sadly the great comic writer and by all accounts nice man David Croft has passed away at the grand old age of 89. My sympathies go out to his family and many friends.

David was a truly iconic writer. I cannot think of any other writer who has written so many classic serials with different partners. From 'Allo 'Allo, to Are You Being Served, Hi De Hi, It Ain't Half Hot Mum, to the iconic Dad's Army he created a unparralled and timeless body of work.

I honestly don't think that they'll ever be a writer who can create such work. The fact that he was Major Croft with a real life before entering the business of show has a lot to do with this. Today writers go from university to TV without life experience. This ignorance limits their work.

David was never crude. His programmes were marked by being able to be seen by the whole family and the class of the actors used. He didn't try to be edgy or cutting edge. He and his writing partners simply wanted to amuse.

From this simple idea they created some timeless, beautiful, work.

David's programmes tended to be set in the past which makes them timeless. They will be shown today and in years to come with equal ease.

The sheer quality of the writing and acting will mean that this work will outlive us all. Pike will always be te gawky man-boy, Godfrey always the keen ancient, Jones the unblunted war horse, Mannering pompous and brave, Wilson ever fay, Gloria forever artistic, Rene the eternal sex symbol.

These lives so fantatically created have entered the world's culture. This is an incredible acheivement for all concerned.

Very few people create iconic characters and phrases. David did both repeatedly. Reflecting a wonderful Britishness his body of work has enriched Britian and have entered our collective culture.

David never set out to create art but that's what he and his partners did. They together with the brilliant actors whole played the roles created real three dimensional characters. That's skill. Captain Mannering was arrogant and silly, but he was also brave, loyal, and honest. Fraser was dour and a gossip but he knew his weakness and was a loyal friend. Gloria was camp but was straight and simply was trying his best not to be killed.

These were real people written out of real experiences. For all the farce and silliness there was a fundamental truth behind David's work.

My admiration for David, his partners and actors increases every year. The sheer talent and understanding is breathtaking.

And so on this sad occasion I can only offer my sympathies to David's family and thanks for all the laughter and joy he brought and will bring us over the years.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Labour's Ivan Lewis, a media caught sex pest, wants to abolish a free press: he's a dick!

The newspapers and the people who write for them have not come out well from the hacking scandal. In short some have behaved abominably. Those who broke the law should be jailed. The way the tabloids, and the self-proclaimed 'quality' papers for that matter, have behaved has been sickening.

However a free press is a vital part of a free country. For all the abuses and sleaze a free press improves our lot and should help uncover political corruption and abuses. Our history is strewn with examples of reporters uncovering such misdeeds and actually helping change things.

A free press is a good thing.

Unless you are the labour Shadow Culture Secretary Ivan Lewis who wants the power to have miscreant reporters stuck off for doing something he dislikes. This totalitarian mindset is indicative of the warped thinking of many on the left. They honestly think they are omnipotent and everyone else should do what they told and not question them.

They want to use fear to curb debate and to stop a press asking questions. Put it this way would you dare probe political abuses if you knew the government could stop you from making a living as a reporter if you do? It's the scary thinking I'd hoped had disappeared with Stalin.

It goes without saying that it is a unworkable wish. Reporters don't have a licence or need to be registered with anybody. For them to be able to be struck off would need a reporter licence and a appeal process set up. This would cost a fortune. It would also be illegal under UK and European law. The right of freedom of expression and the right to earn a living would stop any political witch hunt.

More than that Lewis shows himself to be a 1950's style of lefty. You see he could ban any reporter he doesn't like and it would not make the slightest difference.

I am not a journalist but I can write what I like. Anyone can. There are bloggers out there with much better sources than I who will write about anything they want. It doesn't matter if Lewis doesn't like what they write. As this blog is not UK based it is beyond the control of Lewis or any British court. Political scandal, sleaze, or corruption will out regardless of who Lewis bans.

The world has changed. The genie is out of the bottle and government's cannot put it back in again. He cannot stop someone telling the world of political sleaze.

In the new media world striking people off and depriving them of a living has no effect. Lewis is yet another out of date political type who fails to understand the internet and the unstoppable drive to free expression and uncovering corruption.

Ivan Lewis doesn't like the press one little bit. Only a cynic would suggest that this has anything to do with the way the press uncovered his sexual harassment of a young female civil servant who he bombarded with inappropriate sex texts. The poor woman was forced to move department and then leave the civil service.

That's a free press for you though. Uncovering political abuses and sleaze. No wonder Ivan hates them so.

What a dick he is.

Another Miner Killed

Another tragedy has stuck our few remaining mines. A roof fall at  Kellingley Colliery in Yorkshire has killed a miner. though thankfully his colleague was rescued.

It is now rare for a pitman to be killed, thankfully, but people forget how dangerous mining is. Even with advances in technology, training, and practice, mining is a inherently dangerous activity.

As I've written here before I've never met a miner who wanted their son to follow them into the pit.

My sympathies go to the family and friends of the miner so tragically killed, and I hope his rescued friend makes a full recovery.


Tuesday, 27 September 2011

The idiocy of labour wanting to classify business's good or bad

Ed Miliband, like most labour MP's, has never had their own business. Indeed they've never had a real job outside politics. His life has always been cushioned by vast unearned wealth which makes his disconnect worse. It is this inexperience of the real world that blinds them to the real pressures business face.

In particular the new Red Ed proposal to classify businesses as 'good' or 'bad'. If labour classify you're business as bad they'll be hammered by much higher tax.

It's idiotic.

Not only will it be a legal nightmare to enforce it will damage our economy.

To prove a business is bad is to prove a moral designation. Such classifications gives legal wonks a plethora of grey areas, weak drafting, interpretation, and wiggle room.

This legal argument will take years of very expensive legal argument in court to come to a conclusion on each case and still have many decades of appeal to follow.

Such complexity is a nightmare. As the government legal experts tend to be second-class compared to the killer elite they'll be up against they'll be up for a torrid time.

This process will cost the country time and buckets of cash to enforce.

However the whole antibusiness tone of the proposal will make business pause from investing in the UK or encourage UK business to move offshore or to another EU state.

Put it this way: would you gamble you're income in a country which on a whim can charge you some vast amount because they don't like you?

The trouble for labour is that there are many other EU states, Ireland for a start, who would welcome our businesses. Under EU law such businesses cannot be discriminated against in the UK.

So why would you stay in the UK paying tax and employing people if you can move to a more stable country with no negative implications?

Ed et al simply don't understand business or how hard it is to run any type of business. Good or bad classifications is idiotically simplistic.

It's fatuous.

But that's Ed for you.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Monday, 26 September 2011

Is it right that we cannot deport those who attack us?

My question is this: why cannot we deport people who have done the most horrific crimes to us?

Why cannot we deport convicted foreign terrorists, murderers, rapists, or pedophiles from the UK as our unelected judges say it would be against these criminals human rights. See here.

I simply do not understand how we are forced to keep people who have worked to destroy us and have been involved in the murder of dozens of our fellow countrymen.

To me it's nonsensical that our society gives protection to people who seek to deny and destroy our rights.

Antisocial people who kill, bomb, or rape should be deported regardless of what happens to them in their own countries. This may be harsh but as guests in this country they have the duty to abide by our laws and not try to kill us. A British person living in an other country has the same duties not to murder or rape the locals.

Duties should go hand in hand with our rights. If foreign nationals attack us their rights are void and hey should be kicked out.

It's like us being banned from deporting German Nazi terrorists in the lead up to the Second World War bombing us to win their Nazi war. It's would be stupid.

So is this inability to deport these criminals.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Sunday, 25 September 2011

What is the point of CE/BCE?

There has been moves to replace the traditional AD and BC to what the politically correct people believe to be a more neutral terms of Before Current Era (BCE) and Current Era (CE). Such a trend has been going on for decades. Even at university CE/BCE was been used in the more right-on departments.

Apparently there has been a shift in BBC policy to replace AD/BC with BCE/CE.

This trend has been driven mostly by people of a Christian background who want to force the rest of us to change our terms and thoughts to stop offending people of other religious beliefs.

I've never come across any non-Christian person who has actually been offended by AD or BC. Most people are adult enough not to be bothered by the date. Those who are are so extreme that they should be worried about.

This change is all about an elite trying to control the rest of us. Never underestimate the thrill people get bossing others around.

The thing I've never understood is why bother. CE or BCE are just as inherently Christian as AD and BC. Both have the same dates. Both systems take the birth of Christ as a fixed date in time.

Why bother changing?

If the politically correct forces are seriously concerned that the date offends people then they should make a clean break from the old dates. A new year zero at some random point would be used.

But this isn't about the date it is about bossing us around.

You'd have honestly have thought that people would have much more important things to worry about.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Saturday, 24 September 2011

Ed Balls a bully shocker!!! And this is a surprise?

Ed Balls is a nasty piece of work. He's never had a proper job but he has got to where he is by being Gordon Brown's house trained thug. His whole career is down to his ability to bully, smear, and get his way.

He's a cut price Machiavelli for a dumber world.

This isn't news.

And yet it comes out in a book that Balls is a thug who bullied civil servants to change their economic forecasts in order to allow Brown waste umpteen billions we don't have.

Balls bullied and destroyed careers of those supposedly impartial civil experts who refused to change their views and give labour the lies they needed to spend evermore cash.

All this to allow Brown gain political advantage by spending. It's all about what's best for Balls and his current master rather than what's best for the country.

This is what Balls does he bullies to get his way. He thinks himself to be party street fighter. In reality like most bullies he only picks on the weak.

Balls is a nasty piece of work.

Bit of a pity he's useless at the actual running the country.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Friday, 23 September 2011

UK victims of News International to sue in the US

In what could be a disastrous move for Rupert Murdoch it seems that at least some of the victims of his minions illegal phone hacking are going to sue him in the US.

Now without knowing who us taking such action I've no idea if it is a money grubbing celeb out for a bigger payout or the innocent victim who only wants justice for the crimes done against them.

Either way it's not good for Rupe.

You see his US operation have been at pains to distance themselves from the crimes of their UK colleagues. Put it this way, it's not good business to be tainted by criminal acts if you want to appeal to most Americans.

This strategy has worked.

If there are court cases in the US this distancing operation is in tatters. The media will be full of NI crimes day after day for months. Worse than that documents and witnesses in the US can be used. If these show that US NI minions were involved, sanctioned, demanded, or had any ties to the crimes it would be a nightmare for Rupe.

If there is evidence that he or his cronies allowed his UK staff to hack into celebrities or victims of crime in the US for UK stories then that's the perfect storm.

Rupert wouldn't just be facing huge payouts, and a bad press. He, or at least his staff/sons would be facing jail.

And so this is a bad news day for Murdoch. I would imagine vast buckets of cash are being offered to his victims to stop them using the American courts to stop it happening.

It would probably work.

But if it didn't?

Joy and merriment for all.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, 22 September 2011

The obscene waste of labour's NHS policy

As it happens I'm writing this in hospital. Not as an inpatient or even an outpatient, thankfully, but I've spent too long in NHS hospitals over the last several years to know them inside out.

I am grateful for the NHS and know most people working there are simply trying to do their best. I am not so stupid as to think they are all angels though. I've seen some shocking incompetence and cruelty over the years to know that there are some bad apples.

No organisation is perfect, all have their own share of wrong 'uns.

What really depresses me is the incompetent way labour has used the NHS for their own party political purposes.

I'm sickened by the waste labour's policies have led to. Today the £11-16 billion NHS computer system is going to be scrapped.

Scrapped because it has never worked and is massively over budget.

You'd have thought that the minimum you'd have got from making labour supporting companies incredibility rich is something that works a little bit. However as anyone who has witnessed medical professionals try to use this super new White elephant and fail knows the new system was pants.

It didn't bloody work.

Worse than that it used obsolete technology and rubbish proprietary software rather than efficient, and free, open source software.

This IT project is years late, massively over budget, and doesn't work.

So labour have pissed away up to £16 billion for no reason. They have fallen into the grasping hands of computer snake oil salesmen who bought access to labour, gave them cash, and jobs, and squandered billions.

However it gets worse.

As I've written here previously Gordon Brown decided in his infinite 'wisdom' that it was a good idea to use PFI to buy hospitals. This was the more expensive and risky way of funding new hospitals, schools, etc., but it gave Brown one unique and special thing.

It allowed him to con the public by keeping the billions spent off the books. This is what Enron did. It was a crime when they did so.

But Brown used the same dishonest trick to pretend that he was 'prudent' when he was behaving like an incontinent drunk pissed on someone else's dime.

That fact that such PFI schemes were much more expensive to the paying public didn't concern Brown. It allowed him to obtain political advantage by being able to have his photo taken in front of gleaming new hospitals and still brag about prudence.

It was a con. And like all cons it's come back to bite the victim. Unfortunately it is the public who are the victims here.

It now emerges that sixty hospitals are under threat because their hospital trusts cannot afford the PFI payments due under the incompetent contracts signed by Brown.

And so labour have wasted over £20 billion.

Wasted.

Wasted because the money could have have been much better used elsewhere in the NHS, and wasted because it's cost the taxpayer much more because of the iffy accounting tricks used by Brown and Blair in order to secure electoral advantage.

This is a scandal. The sheer amount of cash is beyond comprehension. However all you need to understand is that labour's actions have killed people and will kill many more over the years.

It really is that simple. The twenty billion wasted is twenty billion cut from patient care. Each penny wasted means the ill are denied drugs or care that would save their lives. Treatment that would have saved lives is denied in order to pay the billions spent by labour on useless schemes.

People have died in order to win labour votes.

And it worked. It did secure the votes and many labour types have made a fortune out of IT and PFI companies.

It's disgusting.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Wednesday, 21 September 2011

Elliot 'fiddler' Morley freed

The ex-labour MP and minister Elliot Morley is a thief. Being a convicted thief he was very lucky to be given only sixteen months in clink.

In yet another example of how our establishment looks after errant members he has been freed early. We knew he'd serve half of his term. However he didn't even serve that pathetic term.

The thief Elliot Morley served four months!!

To my mind punishment is about showing the public's view of a crime as well as a deterrent. The severity of a punishment should reflect the position of the criminal. If a social worker abused a child who have been entrusted to their care they'd deserve a much more severe punishment because of their position of trust. An accountant who stole from clients deserve punishment because of their abuse of trust.

If a member of parliament used their rarified position to steal or abuse their power then they should receive a more severe punishment than one of us. They have our trust and have unique privileges because of this. If they betray us they should be made to pay.

But the incestuous elite who run the system won't do that. Thieves like Morley are protected.

It's not right.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Tuesday, 20 September 2011

What type of idiot has a disgraced Tony Blair as an advisor: David Cameron

Tony Blair has always been a controversial figure. His history of lying about even the trivial, and the many hundreds of thousands of dead he's caused makes him toxic.

And this is before his truffle hound-like grubbing for money we've seen since he left power.

His raw greed has cheapened his reputation and has made him some very sleazy, in some cases psychopathic, friends. Gadaffi is but one dictator who is a close personal chum, as is the fallen Egyptian dictator.

All that matters to the Blair is money and freebies.

It's disgusting.

So why the hell is Tory PM David Cameron going to such a hated, poisonous, creep to advise him on the Middle East?

As a country we have thousands of very expensive trained diplomats whose only job is to provide advice to the PM, so why use a corrupt ex-politician who has been proved to such up to Middle East dictators for lots of loverly cash?

It's idiotic.

The problem is that Cameron, Clegg, Miliband, and Blair are the same type of people. All rich, all public school Oxbridge types who've never had a proper job in their lives. They are the same identikit professional politician there to make a lot of money out of politics.

Cameron uses Blair because he wants to follow his avaricious example and use his current position to make even more money when he steps down.

Cameron, Clegg, Miliband, et al, see nothing wrong with using their positions to become rich. They are so insular Cameron doesn't see how using a hated labour leader will not go down well with his party, or the country at large.

Pathetic really.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Monday, 19 September 2011

The Dowler family's payoff

One of the most horrific aspects of all the fluff and rage surrounding the press phone hacking has been the way in which the tabloids, most infamously the defunct News of the World, hacked into murder victims phones.

The unspeakable violation of the phone of the murder victim Milly Dowler and the cruel way in which they gave this tragic girl's family false hope by erasing her messages thus suggesting she was still alive symbolises all that is wrong with the press.

Today it emerges that her parents have been offered over £2 million, plus a further million to be given to charity, by News International to make their crime go away.

Now this is a great deal of money. As such I do not criticise Milly's parents for dropping their case. I cannot say I would not accept the cash.

It's a fortune.

Good look to them. I hope the payoff helps people.

But.....

It's a shame that the scum who hacked a phone of a murdered girl, and perhaps more importantly, the journalists, editors, and owners who ordered the hacking, condoned it, or allowed such horrific acts to happen in their business escape yet again from being brought to account.

The Dowler's deserve peace and I hope the money helps a little.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Sunday, 18 September 2011

The Guardian whining for being investigated for a crime they call others to be prosecuted for

Hypocrisy isn't a nice trait.

The Guardian have absolutely loved the controversy of the tabloid press being investigated by the police for their illegal hacking, bribing police, etc. They've called for the wrongdoers to be dealt with harshly.

They could hardly contain their joy.

The pages of the Guardian have been full of reports of the police investigation. By printing secret Information, in some cases telling the world who is about to be arrested before the arrest took place they have shown their ties to some police officers steps over the line.

Like the scandal of the landlord of Jo Yates who the press crucified by using confidential police information which could have derailed any trial, the Guardian have been being using police contacts to print sensitive details of a ongoing police investigation and could scupper any trial.

Both cases show an out of control press.

However for some reason the self-proclaimed moral bastion that is the Guardian don't seem to think that actions by other papers which merit jail should result in the same punishment when they do it.

They seem to think that when they corrupt a police officer and potentially scupper an ongoing investigation, when when they could stop a prosecution due to media coverage, it's the fault of others. They seem to think that their illegal actions and alleged crimes are justified and that any investigation into their corruption of the police is an attack on the freedom of the press.

It isn't.

The press play an important part in our culture but they don't have the right to corrupt the police or endanger an ongoing investigation.

This hacking scandal is a crime for which the guilty need punishment. However the severity of the scandal is not so large that it gives the Guardian permission to commit the same crimes as the tabloids to cover it.

The Guardian is just as guilty as the tabloids and deserves the same punishment.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Saturday, 17 September 2011

A fund launched for the victims of the Gleision Colliery mining disaster

It is the worst possible news that all four of the miners trapped in the Gleision Colliery, Pontardawe, Charles Breslin, 62, David Powell, 50, Garry Jenkins, 39, and Phillip Hill, 45, have been killed in this terrible accident.

People who have no connection to mines romanticise the miners. Yes there was unbreakable bonds of friendship but the danger of the work, and the terrible working conditions overrode them. I have never met a single miner who wanted their son to go down the mines.

For all the improvements in technology and safety mining is a dangerous activity.

Thankfully mining accidents are rare in the UK. Safety has improved but the fact is we have few mines so have fewer accidents. My local cathedral has a book of remembrance for all the miners who lost their lives. Each page of the book is a date of an accident. It's a large book and is full, the dead number thousands. Even with improvements in mining the deaths continued until the mines were closed.

Forget the idealistic ideas of the romance of mining and how the working-class should return to the pits. Mining kills people and scars the environment.

The poor men at Gleision Colliery paid a terrible price for this danger.

My deepest sympathies go to the families of the four men. An appeal is being launched to raise money for the bereaved. This site, www.minersappealfund.org will go live today. I urge anyone who wishes to make a donation.





- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Friday, 16 September 2011

On the danger of mining

In tragic news a body of one of the three trapped miners has been found at the Gleision Colliery near Pontardawe, Wales. I can only add my voice to the others praying that his friends are found alive.

I come from a mining area. Members of my family were miners. In one of my first jobs I had to lecture ex-miners. Although the only mines I've ever entered have been museums I have some understanding of mining and the human costs of such dangerous work.

I've seen men unable to breath due to mining. I've known a man who lost most of the fingers of one hand due to a tunnel collapse. Having to have his fingers cut off without anaesthetic to save his life shows how brutal and perilous mining was and is.

So I know that mining is a inherently dangerous endeavour. For all the new technology, which thankfully reduces the risk, the risk remains. For all the idealistic thinking about how great mining is it remains dangerous. Technological advances cannot remove the danger.

I offer my sympathies to the bereaved and hope the two remaining lost miners are found safe and uninjured.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, 15 September 2011

On Johann Hari's "apology"

Johann Hari has made a fortune by being a leftwing columnist. He has won all the right leftwing prizes for his writing.

He is also a liar.

He has been caught all through his career fabricating his interviews, making stuff up, and using false identities to attack others and to whitewash his own misdeeds.

He's had a good run but his lies have finally come home to roost and he has been proved to by a lair who is untrustworthy.

In a pathetic 'apology' in today's Independent he seeks to draw a line under his misdeeds and pointedly ignores how he has betrayed his readers and how he has built a career on making stuff up.

This column isn't brave it is the mealy mouthed drivel of a man without any other options. His ignoring of his countless lies and exaggerations and misdeeds is cowardly in the extreme.

He is now off to attend a course on journalism in the US before he returns to his lucrative career.

It's the old ruse of putting some space between himself and his naughtiness until we forget what he did.

The thing is you shouldn't need specialist training in journalism to know that you shouldn't make stuff up, lie, or use false identities to support yourself in arguments.

The fact that being caught lying throughout your career doesn't mean you get sacked or drummed out of journalism doesn't show journalism in a very good light.

I am surprised by the numbers of people who support Hari because of his politics. I don't care what his politics are, any journalist who has done what Hari has done should be finished. It doesn't matter if you agree with them or not.

For the Independent to keep employing a writer who has lied to their readers is wrong. For the Orwell prize to let Hari hand back his prize (though we are not sure about if he returned the cash element) rather than publicly stripping the prize from a proven liar diminishes the award.

It is a disgrace that Hari isn't finished.

It is a disgrace that people who knew of Hari's misdeeds for decades to let him get away with it.

Hari is a disgrace.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Nathan Eccleston has the right to an opinion, even though he's wrong

Liverpool Striker Nathan Eccleston is twenty and doesn't believe that terrorists were behind the 9/11 attacks. He tweeted his followers

'I aint going to say attack don't let the media make u believe that was terrorist that did it.'


Not a well written tweet to be honest. Indeed looking at it a lot of it nonsensical gibberish. This may reflect the lack of education of some footballers.

There now seems to be a media orchestrated outrage with his football club being pressured into holding an inquiry.

As it happens I don't agree with Eccleston but I find the criticism of his right to say something, however wrong, worse. Freedom of expression means we can can say anything we like, as long as it doesn't call for illegal acts to be committed. If you call for someone to be killed or raped then that is a crime. But anything else is fair game.

You don't have to be right to have the freedom to express yourself.

For a young person to be investigated by his employer for what he said in a private capacity in his own time is worrying. He is paid far too much to kick a ball and that's it. His club should have no power of veto over what he says or thinks. No employer should have.

If he was guilty of a criminal act or called for violence then it should concern his club. Anything else is none of their business.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Henry Winkler OBE

In news that makes me strangely happy Henry Winkler has been awarded an honorary OBE.

The only thing that would have been better if he'd been 'done' by the Queen rather by an ambassador.

This news makes me smile as the idea of the Fonz getting a serious honour is amusing. More than that I like the fact that Henry got his award for helping British children with dyslexia. The visiting of schools to help children cope with dyslexia is a wonderful thing to do.

Too often honours are awarded to connected people, the rich, or the famous who don't actually do anything only put there name to some trendy cause.

This is different. This is a man who takes time out to help vulnerable children with no thought to profiting from it.

Henry deserves his award. Much more so than Bill Gates' knighthood for giving one of Tony Blair's idiot kids work experience.

So this this glad news to brighten our days. Good for Henry.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

Troll imprisoned

One of the most moving things on the Internet is the way in which people can celebrate the lives of loved ones. The ability to commemorate and remember loved ones who have passed away is not the most glamourous of things but by allowing people to come together and find comfort is very human and rather wonderful.

For people who have lost family and friends who are young it has an added poignancy. The young have been brought up online so it's natural that they are remembered online.

Anyone who has spent any time on the Internet know that there is a dark side to the good. I've lost count of times I've been threatened with death, or worse, on other sites I write for. The first time was a bit of a shock but after a while you get used to it.

For some people anonymity brings out their dark, bullying, side.

One of the worst things on the internet is the way in which trolls target sites set up to remember loved ones.

It's sickening.

Sean Duffy is a 25 year old man whose hobby was finding Internet sites remembering the lives of young people who could not take their bullying and tragically killed themselves, or who had died in tragic circumstances.

Duffy got off by continuing the bullying by posting vile, vicious, and sickening attacks on these innocent kids.

This cowardly thug has now been convicted and imprisoned for 18 weeks for his actions.

As it happens I am all for freedom of expression and Internet freedom. The way in which governments, business, and groups seek to curtail what we say is worrying.

However in Duffy's case I shed no tears for his sentence even though I wouldn't have handed it down to him.

What type of sick creep gets a thrill from attacking young people, mostly young blond girls, who have died in tragic circumstances?

For a 25 year old adult to get off doing it shoes that he has serious mental problems.

Duffy really is one sick puppy.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Tuesday, 13 September 2011

And in good news for labour Ed Miliband is booed by the TUC

Things have not been going terribly well for Red Ed Miliband, the labour party leader who lost the labour and MP vote and only became leader because of the undemocratic union block vote.

For him to be constantly behind the polls to the Tory party who've been hit by riot and woeful economic figures is unbelievable.

However there has been a tad of good news for Ed today when his speech to his union masters at the TUC saw the union types boo him.

With the growing unpopularity of strikes and the ridiculous union leader calls for law breaking it is a brilliant opportunity to spin his distance from the unions. It allows Ed to try to persuade people that he is on their side and not the union barons.

Handy that. A cynic would say that such booing was orchestrated with that image in mind.

The thing to remember is that Ed is only labour leader because of the unions and that the unions pay labour's bills.

Ed is the creature of the unions.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Monday, 12 September 2011

The 9/11 protests in London

One of the most dignified things we as a society do is remember the dead. A brief silence to mark and anniversary can be incredibly moving.

With the 9/11 anniversary remembering the thousands of innocent people whose lives were snuffed out sixty seconds of silence is not a lot to ask but is a powerful sign of our common humanity.

So I'm sickened by the noisy protests and the burning of the American flag outside the US embassy during the silence. It doesn't matter if you agree with what has happened after the attack, innocent people died.

Sometimes I wonder if the Muslim extremists who do such protests are in the pay of anti-Muslim forces. This protest does them or their cause no favours. All it does is turn more people against all Muslims.

Most Muslims are peaceful who don't agree with the extremists so the backlash such protests cause is unfair. Like I say you'd think anti-Muslim forces are behind such protests.

It is sad that the extremists can do their unpleasant protests protected by the police. Other extremists groups cannot protest against other issues, especially against Muslim extremists so it seems odd.

The inflammatory actions of the Muslim extremists resulted in a English Defence League counter protest and altercation. This led to two people being stabbed. As each extremist side had one member stabbed I wonder what the police will do. For too long the EDF have been targeted, in cases of violence rightly but in denying them their right to peaceful protest wrongly, but Muslim extremists not only allowed to preach violence but are protected by the police whilst doing it.

What happens when both sides are guilty of the same despicable act?

The Muslim extremists are damaging other Muslims with their pantomime acts. They really need to grow up.




- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Sunday, 11 September 2011

On the anniversary of 9/11

In some respects the ten years since the terrorist attacks of 9/11 seem only yesterday. And yet our world has changed massively due to this horrific attack. Countries have fallen. Hundreds of thousands have died. The controversy remains.

However the wider political implications of these atrocities are for another day. My sympathy goes out to the family and friends of the murdered and I remember all those who died too young.

For all of what has happened since the true nightmare and hell of the attacks we must never forget the real people who died, and the real people who are injured or bereaved, are to often forgotten.

We must never forget the flesh and blood people who died and suffer.

Ten years and yet it seems only moments ago.

We need to remember the victims of 9/11. We should never forget the human suffering of that day regardless of what happened since.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Saturday, 10 September 2011

Tony Blair says he didn't know about rendition to Libya when PM

After the fall of the Libyan leader a harsh light had been thrown on labour and their very close ties of friendship and money that link them to this dictator. It now emerged that labour ordered the rendition of people to this benighted dictatorship.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realise that this would not end well for the poor bastards rendered.

Now that Cameron is seen to have had a good war (though this can change) labour's links with the ex-Libyan ruling family is damaging to labour. This damage could get worse as more information comes to light.

It is against this scandal that Tony Blair tells us that he did not know that the government which he was PM was handing people over to Libyan security. He tells us he didn't know his government was helping the security apparatus of a man he told us was his friend, a man who a lot of people close to him made fortunes, a man whose closest friends holiday with the dictator's sons.

I don't believe him.

I hope his actions finally come back to bite him, though I doubt they will.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Friday, 9 September 2011

Worrying about the language skills and training of foreign nurses isn't racist

The labour peer Lord Winston is a medical man at the very top of his field. Regardless of his politics he is a man who knows how the health service operates.

So when he, and the cross bench peer and surgeon, Lord Kakkar, raise serious concerns about the idiocy if employing EU nurses without them having to pass any basic language competency tests of checks to ensure they meet UK training standards we should listen.

Their point is that the banning of even the most basic language tests or ensuring that they meet UK nursing standards, is judged to be illegal under EU law as a block to freedom of movement within the EU, is placing patients lives in danger due to the language barrier.

The peers single out eastern European nurses, specifically from Romania and Bulgaria.

To my mind this isn't racist. It's not discrimination in any way. ANY nurse or doctor working in another country needs to be fluent in the local language and meet the local training standards. It doesn't matter if we are talking about eastern Europeans working on the UK, or British people working in another country the need to be fluent in the local language. Not bring able to understand the locals or bring incompetent kills people.

The current system is simply a out of touch organisation enforcing their ideal of a single European state and ignoring the simple fact that their rules could kill people.

It's insane. It needs to be changed.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, 8 September 2011

Sir Stuart Bell's dereliction of duty

One of the most important things an MP does is to hold regular surgeries in their particular patch. This allows local people to ask them for advice, raise concerns, ask for help, and allows them to keep in touch with local concerns. Such surgeries are a fundamental part of the job of being an MP. Ministers and Prime Ministers hold such surgeries.

But not our old friend the labour Sir Stuart Bell.

He hasn't bothered with holding a single surgery in fourteen years. He doesn't have an office in is area, and lives in France. In short he has no contact with the people he is supposed to represent.

The local constituency newspaper tried telephoning him using different phone numbers, during office hours, and whilst parliament was sitting, and received no answer.

This inability for the people he is supposed to represent to contact him is wrong.

Worse than this is the fact that Bell's wife is being paid £35,000 a year to run his office, and just shy of £83,000 a year for this useless office.

Bell is simply failing in his duty of being an MP. A job which has brought him a knighthood and a fortune. It also shows that his employment of his wife (like his employment on expenses of his son who used the access to steal) is untenable. If she is so useless as to answer the phone or acknowledge such calls she is simply not worth £35,000 a year and is ripping the taxpayer off and Bell is ripping us off.

Bell is simply not doing his job and ripping us off.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

On some MP's love of 'gifts'

I was once given a free hat by a company I had dealings with. Their name was emblazoned upon it. For some reason I was pleased and have been dealing with them ever since, though not because of the hat. The illusion of friendship such trivial gifts elicit are a useful tool in cementing business relationships and a really cheap way to generate income.

However this is a cheap gift given in the hope I would keep giving them my money. The giver receives material benefit from the gift. Other gifts are given in the hope that my company gives them contracts.

This is part of business. The gifts are trivial. If they cost thousands or were cash then this would be bribery and corruption as it would tempt the receiver of the largesse to give contracts to the giver even though it would be better to give the contract to another company.

And that's the danger with gifts. They can pervert the decision making process.

Such things are part of business and most people are aware of the adage that there is no such thing as a free lunch.

It is in light of the above that I read with interest the list of politicians, some of them high-ranking shadow ministers, who have received gifts from business worth thousands.

Douglas Alexander the former Labour international development secretary, accepted “two tickets to the Wimbledon finals and hospitality” worth £1,000 from the global sports and media business IMG. David Willetts, the universities minister, enjoyed £870 worth at the All-England club from the engineering group IMI. Japan Tobacco International took three MPs to see England’s triumph over India at the Oval, but treated them to different levels of pampering. Aidan Burley registered hospitality worth £579, Oliver Colvile £694.80 and Simon Danczuk £1,158 — for two people.
Silverstone for the Formula 1 race was also popular. Peter Hain, the former Labour Cabinet minister, had two tickets for the British Grand Prix worth £782 from the Motor Sports Association, as did the Tory Mark Lancaster. Ken Clarke, the Justice Secretary, had two from the Motor Sports Association worth £836, while Ben Wallace, another Tory, records two from the RAC Motor Sports Association worth £1,500.
Richard Burden had two three-day passes from the Motor Sports Association worth £2,508. Andrew Miller, Labour MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston, was, however, in pole position: Virgin Media gave him “two tickets for the British Grand Prix and hospitality” worth £3,657.


How is this acceptable?

Such expensive gifts are given for a reason. They may not be so blatant as to ask for a big contract but they are used to give the impression that these companies are friends of the particular politician. This in turn could lead to future contracts, changes in a law to favour the company, or even honours for the the giver's.

This process allows rich, connected, businesses to buy favour with politicians denied to other companies without such lavish entertaining budgets. More than this, it's part and parcel of the whole soft corruption and sense of entitlement that has demeaned the whole political process.

In short the whole thing stinks and is sleazy.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Amelia Hill: Guardian journalist questioned under caution.

The hacking of phones, emails, etc., is illegal and wrong. The NoW and News International has rightly been castigated for their illegal activities.

In the feeding frenzy of rival media blocks and politicians wanting to get the own back for the media printing all about their dodgy dealings the most vitriolic in their attack has been the Guardian stable of papers.

They have gone berserk with blood lust.

However like I keep saying for all the crime and frankly horrible behaviour of the NI paper's they weren't the only ones at fault.

And so it is with delicious delight that the Guardian's very own Amelia Hill has been questioned under caution for her alleged illegal behaviour.

It really is not surprising considering the the amount of timed the Guardian and Observer have been found to have acted illegally.

What is really pathetic is the way in which the Guardian is reporting the arrest. Rather than telling the truth that it is a case of a reporter acting illegally they are trying to divert attention from the same criminal behaviour they have attacked the NoW for they are spinning the story into one about how there is now a climate of fear due to this attack on the press. Their whole spin is this arrest is going to stop all contacts between the press and the police.

It isn't: this is about a Guardian reporter being interrogated for bribing police and receiving confidential police documents during a ongoing investigation.

Any illegality should be punished regardless of it being done be the tabloids or the self-proclaimed quality press.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Margaret Moran charged with theft

Another ex-MP, the labour creature Margaret Moran, has been charged with stealing £60,000 from the public.

Two things here. The first is why she is only being charged for stealing £60,000 from us when she stole £98,000.

The second is the suggestion that she's going to be last MP who is going to be charged for their crimes.

Moran's abuses were shameless and she deserves serious prison time, but she was not the only one out there who stole from us.

Moran should face justice but like I have always said so do all those MP's who stole from us. I don't care about who they are, how powerful or high-up, nor what party they belong to, if they stole from us the should face prison. There should be no amnesty for their crimes because they happened a few years ago.

If they stole from prosecute them.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Tuesday, 6 September 2011

Will Libya destroy labour In time for the next election?

As things stand David Cameron's Libyan adventure has gone well for him. He's proved his labour critics wrong and has emerged as a world leader. Now things could go pear shaped and disaster ensue but as of now it's gone well for him.

If things continue to go well for him then he may have started a bomb ticking by allowing him to use this adventure to destroy the labour top bods just in time for the next election.

Let me explain: it is now well known how close labour and their leaders were to the ex-Libyan dictator and his family. Such closeness has been proved in captured documents to involve intelligence links, and perhaps labour support to rendition.

This are not only sleazy and embarrassing, they are criminal in some cases. Any intelligence links, military links, or political links could only be done at labour's behest. It is the then labour government who are to blame for any illegality.

In parliament Cameron did not point fingers and blame labour for the mess. That may have given him some short term boost but wouldn't have made any difference. What he did in full apolitical mode is announce an inquiry into the links.

Such inquiries take time, in fact they should be in full flow just before the next election. If he plays it right he will have labour politicians, including Ed Miliband giving testimony about their close links to a dictator and their own criminal activities.

All under oath and in public.

If all goes well this will show them to be greedy and eager to condone illegal activities for a buck.

If the fallen Libyan elite make it to international court then the selfsame labour big wigs may find themselves giving evidence and may face charges in a criminal court for their actions.

We are used to politicians being let off their crimes. Inquires which they testify are never held under oath, records go missing, questions go unasked. Tankers full of whitewash abound.

However with incriminating documents out there beyond the control of our politicians and a foreign court in charge things may not be so simple for labour.

If Cameron is lucky labour could face a very torrid time. It could destroy their election prospects.

It would be a change to see any politician face justice for their bloody actions.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Monday, 5 September 2011

Tony Blair is like family to Rupert Murdoch

Rupert Murdoch is now regarded as utterly beyond the pale. Labour in particular are seeking to destroy his empire. I myself, as is well known to readers here, despise him and all his works. However you need to remember that his political power only exists because politicians gave it to him.

Murdoch has been controversial for decades do it's a bit rich for labour to go after him one after their thirteen years of power and the way in which they prostrated themselves at his feet to gain his papers support.

So much is shallow politics but it now emerges that Murdoch's ties with labour, specifically with ex-prime minister Tony Blair goes much further than that.

He's part of their Murdoch's extended family.

It's now come out in an interview with Rupert's current wife Wendi in Italian Vogue that Blair became their daughter Grace's godparent last year.

Blair is now Murdoch family.

For all the faux outrage around Murdoch remember that Blair and labour not only refused to stop the crimes but that Blair is close friends with the the loathsome Murdoch.

Becoming godparent to a Murdoch child after leaving power shows they are friends. This in turn shows a support for the well known misdeeds of the Murdoch press. They say actions speak louder than words. In this case it shows a total disregard for the victims of his hacks and close friendship. It shows a remarkable disconnect from the majority of his party. It shows a love of the very rich that labour has become synonymous with.

Not nice.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Sunday, 4 September 2011

The joke security at the UK Embassy in Libya.

The security services cost this county a pretty penny. The fact we don't usually hear of their work proves this is money well spent. In intelligence and security you really only hear something when something has gone very wrong indeed.

I think our security services tend to do a good job, though limited by budget and political will.

I am however surprised by the story of the mass of documents embarrassing to the last labour government left strewn at the UK Ambassador's residence in Libya.

These documents prove how much labour lied about their ties to the murderous Libyan dictatorship and paint a very unedifying image of labour double dealing.

I'm not shocked by labour sucking up to a rich dictator, we've seen their love of money to often to be shocked by that. No I'm surprised by the fact that our very expensive and highly trained security staff ran away leaving such documents strewn on the floor.

This is a fundamental mistake. One of the key elements in the security plans of any embassy is what to do if you have to evacuate. This includes things like how to get staff out, even where the military could land if the airports or harbours are blocked, but it also includes the destruction of sensitive documents, keeping staff safe, how to stop foreign spies, etc.

Such plans are do not indicative of a dangerous environment but a routine part of any embassy contingency plans.

So why were the documents left by the diplomats?

When Saigon fell and the US embassy had to be evacuated they left bags of shredded documents. Such shredding was supposed to make them unreadable. Unfortunately the communist government in Vietnam painstakingly taped the shreds together and used them to round up, imprison, or kill, thousands of people named in the documents.

It was a disaster.

However over time we've learned how to destroy documents better and Vietnam shows how vital it is for diplomatic documents to be permanently destroyed.

The UK embassy staff in what seems to be blind panic not only did not use the weeks of tension to systematically destroy totally all sensitive documents, they didn't even bother shredding anything. These letters from the UK prime minister were left intact.

This is diplomatic negligence of the worst kind. Alas no one will be brought to account. Today it's only embarrassment, next time people will die.


- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Saturday, 3 September 2011

On the legal moves to secure an inquest for Dr David Kelly

Dr David Kelly must have been a remarkable man. I remember reading about him before his tragic death and thinking what a decent, clever, and tenacious man this was. He was also one of the world's leading experts on weapons of mass destruction.

His death was a tragedy for his family and his many friends. The world is less safe now that we don't have his unique knowledge and experience.

I feel he was placed in an untenable position by the then labour government and their willing stooges at the BBC who hounded this good man to his death for daring to speak the truth.

The way labour and the BBC treated him was an utter disgrace.

I do not believe he was murdered.

However expert medical people have raised concerns about this mode of death, the lack of fingerprints, a blunt knife, and the impossibility of killing oneself in the way the official version says, etc.

I have no idea if these concerns are valid, but then again I'm not a medical expert with decades of training and experience like these experts.

These doctors are taking the government decision to deny Dr Kelly a proper inquest in which evidence would be given under oath and the actual facts of the case examined to court to try to force an inquest to be held.

And I fully support their case. Even though I don't believe Dr Kelly was murdered I find it plain wrong that he has been denied a proper inquest and that all the information about his death is being kept secret for seventy years.

Both the refusal of an inquest and the insane levels of secrecy surrounding his death are unique. No other person has been denied an inquest. No other suicide has the facts of their death hidden for the best part of century.

Such moves only serve to strengthen the conspiracy theories surrounding his death which cannot be good.

For what it's worth I believe that this denial of justice, and not taking evidence under oath, is not because he was murdered but to stop labour politicians and BBC types from being embarrassed by their actions. It's to stop details of how the labour attack machine worked with the BBC and other pet media outlets to out Kelly as a confidential source for a story, to destroy his career, and how they made his life such a hell he felt he had no option but to kill himself.

Justice needs openness. Dr Kelly deserves a proper inquest just like every other person in this country. I don't care who it embarrasses.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Friday, 2 September 2011

The hypocritical protest by Professor Jonathan Rosenhead

The Israeli Philharmonic Orchestra was due to perform at the Proms last night. This cultural event had to be called off because pro-Palestinian protesters disrupted the performance.

I do not, and never have, thought protesting cultural or sporting events was a valid way of protesting. You can disagree with governments and their actions but musicians, artists, academics, or sportspeople aren't responsible.

It would be like you are I being protested for the actions of our government whilst on holiday. We have no influence or responsibility for the actions of our government. So such attacks would be both wrong and counterproductive.

I do find it disturbing that it's only Israel who is subject to such protests. China, Saudi Arabia, and the like who have a much worse human rights record escape unhindered. For some people Israeli could easily be replaced with Jew.

One of the leading lights in yesterdays musical censorship was one Professor Jonathan Rosenhead of the London School of Economics. He has what is known as form. A labour party member and parliamentary candidate (failed), he doesn't like Israel. He was also a professor of management in spite of never actually having worked in business or any organisation outside his academic ivory tower, which seems a tad odd. He was a strong supporter if calls to boycott Israeli academics a few years back.

Strangely only Israelis were singled out not Chinese, Zimbabweans, Syrians, or any country with worse human rights records. Such a boycott would be an anathema to academic freedom and all that it stands for. The collective punishment of a people for the actions of a few would be illegal under international law.

Anyway Rosenhead's doesn't like Israel.

He is however silent on any abuses by any other country. Worse than that he hasn't protested his own university and their close ties to the failing Libya dictator, or their allowing his son and war criminal to study at the LSE, or about the fortunes the LSE received from a known war criminal and dictator.

That is hypocrisy.

For some their concern about the lives of others stops at the Palestinian people. Middle Eastern dictators can massacre at will and escape protest and still be welcomed into their arms.

For Rosenhead to protest an orchestra whilst supporting his university's ties to war criminals of long standing is wrong.

Rosenhead should put his own house in order and deal with his own university's links to mass murderers, for which he has some responsibility and say, before attacking others who are not tainted by blood like an orchestra.

- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad

Thursday, 1 September 2011

Why is making all of us obey the law controversial?

The world is wracked by injustice. However I simply do not understand why the ruling against travellers need to obey the same laws that apply to us is seen by some to be controversial.

Basically a group of travellers illegally build on protected green belt land. The important word here is illegal. Green belt land is practically impossible to build on as the whole idea is to protect the environment by stopping people building on it.

And it really is that simple. The law protects the environment.

However these illegal builders have fought tooth and nail to be allowed to stay telling the world that it would be against their human rights to evict them. They've now lost their case, which is a surprise, and are not happy and are now threatening violence if the the powers that be try to uphold the law and evict them.

For years travellers have been treated with kid gloves by the authorities terrified of accusations of racism in the politically correct world they inhabit. Not paying tax, having road tax or insurance, etc., are common. My local traveller site had a mass brawl bordering on a riot. The police would not turn up until it was over and then denied it happened. Even when a gun was waved at a separate incident the police weren't bothered.

They have been treated differently than any other person. And that's wrong.

The loony fringes of the left are not happy about the decision. The same wealthy individuals do not have to put with illegal encampments or offer their land for these travellers. Then again hypocrisy is not new to such people.

I honestly do not understand why this decision is controversial. The whole point of a modern legal system and a advanced society is that the laws apply to all of us regardless of our class, race, creed, political belief, or gender.

Equality should be all.

If we cannot build on green belt land illegally then they shouldn't. It isn't controversial. It isn't discrimination. It's the rule of law and justice.

Only idiots could think otherwise.



- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad