The Ku Klux Klan is, I believe, a despicable organisation. Their move to violence was so horrific that one of the founders turned his back on them. In short I don't like them,
However they are legal. As a supporter of free speech I accept that. I'm not happy with it, but I accept it. The thing is you don't have to be happy with any group in order for them to be legal.
As a legal organisation PayPal, VISA, and MasterCard can do business with them. Well it is if you take a position that you are impartial. This is a logical consistent view.
However that is not what PayPal, et all are doing. They took an explicit decision not to treat Wikileaks impartiality. They treated them differently to the KKK. And that's the problem.
Wikileaks is a legal organisation. It has been subject to no legal case in the US or anywhere. There has been no court case or judgement that makes these financial organisations shut down their accounts. It is VISA's, et all, choice.
The treatment of Wikilekas when contrasted with the KKK, or any other legal organisation, is marked. It is this hypocrisy and craven surrender to the US politicians or public that is the problem.
You can find a million and one groups who use VISA, et al, whom you don't agree with. You'll find racists, religious extremists, pro & anti-abortionists, Jews, communists, Catholics, Muslims, the far left and the ultra right, and millions of others, use them to raise money or pay their bills.
All of these bodies are free to do so, unless a court has ruled that they are illegal. You can disagree with a lot of these groups depending upon your political or religious stance. This is fine, but it doesn't mean they should be banned our have their accounts suspended. Not unless a court says they should be.
I do find it worrying that these international businesses will suspend any account because some politician or media group in the US says so.
Giving in to the will of a politician or the mob is scary.
They suspend Wikileaks which is good, if you believe that they should be suspended. But what happens if they suspend your group? What happens if they suspend you because a politician or newspaper doesn't like you? Without any legal protection for you and your rights?
This isn't about Wikileaks as such, rather it is doing something out of fear rather than doing what a court says.
We have courts and laws. These laws protect all of us. The defend our rights. We are supposed to have moved away from the dark days where political bullying can drive a coach and horses over our rights.
If a court said that Wikilekas had acted illegally and ordered tthe suspension of their accounts then fine. But this is just giving in to graven political bullying.
The thing is that PayPal, VISA, and MasterCard are international bushiness who make most of their money outside the US. To link their businesses to the US, and to open up the possibility that anyone's accounts can be suspended because some American politician says so without any court being involved is a bad business choice.
Would you use them if there is a chance that you'll be suspended on the say so of a fly-by-night politician?
The Guidos:Most Successful Delivery of an Order-Order Blog Post Into Policy - The nominees are: Douglas Carswell: The People’s EU Bill Andrew Mitchell: Banning international aid towards the Indian Space Programme Francis Maude: Banni...
1 hour ago